A. Muller
To Win
U. Humbert
To Win
Ugo Humbert vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L L W L
Form
L L W L L L W L L WH2H: Humbert 2 - 0 Etcheverry
They have played 7 sets in total, with Humbert winning 5 and Etcheverry winning 2. The last match between Humbert and Etcheverry was at the Bordeaux Challenger, 20-05-2023, Final, Clay with Ugo Humbert getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ugo Humbert | 2 |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 0 |
Bordeaux Challenger(20-05-2023)
7
6
6
4
| Humbert | Stats | Etcheverry |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (12-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (10-13) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 22 | Ranking | 51 |
| 13 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 26 | Age | 25 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 20 | Titles | 8 |
| 61% (356-226) | Career Total W/L | 62% (355-217) |
| $5,486,660 | Career Prize Money | $2,875,165 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Sonego PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Navone PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Humbert VS Etcheverry H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 |
Stats 
Ugo Humbert
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
62%
(
90 of
146)
1st Serve %
70%
(
105 of
150)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
69 of
105)
57%
(
32 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
46 of
146)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
57 of
150)
157
Total Points Won
139
|
||||
Humbert VS Etcheverry H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 38 | Games Won | 32 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:41:37 | Average Match Time | 2:41:37 |
| 59% (126/214) | 1st Serve % | 70% (158/225) |
| 79% (99/126) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (107/158) |
| 57% (50/88) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (34/67) |
| 35% (6/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 37% (84/225) | Return Points Win % | 30% (65/214) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ugo Humbert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Ugo Humbert
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Nicolas Jarry
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
4
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Ugo Humbert
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
116)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
50 of
67)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
111
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Ugo Humbert
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Ugo Humbert
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
6
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
5
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Kei Nishikori
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Ugo Humbert
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
13
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Jiri Lehecka
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
13
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Zizou Bergs
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
14 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Corentin Moutet
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nicolas Mejia
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (356/226) | Win/Loss | 62% (355/217) |
| 59% (848/594) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (813/559) |
| 53% (7510/6582) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7028/6001) |
| 65% (150/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (43/46) |
| 48% (49/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (297/154) |
| 65% (130/69) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 56% (27/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
| 0.53 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 3631 | Aces Total | 2276 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1489 | Total Double Faults | 840 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:53:15 |
| 351.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 239.2 |
| 61% (25527/42147) | 1st Serve % | 67% (25756/38167) |
| 74% (18842/25527) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (17839/25756) |
| 53% (8735/16597) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6372/12411) |
| 39% (1507/3908) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1691/4036) |
| 37% (15990/42713) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15882/39364) |
| 47% (23/26) | Slam W/L | 56% (20/16) |
| 47% (38/43) | Masters W/L | 39% (12/19) |
| 64% (7/4) | Cups W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 61% (102/66) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (54/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 72% (94/36) | Challenger W/L | 67% (128/62) |
| 64% (88/49) | Futures W/L | 69% (136/62) |
| 62% (328/525) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (334/534) |
| 45% (24/53) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (17/32) |
| 49% (128/262) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (96/192) |
| 51% (101/197) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (103/188) |
| 84% (352/294) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (352/294) |
| 16% (352/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (352/56) |
| 26% (229/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (219/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
